News

The Third Degree

The Freemasons open their door to the curious, and we walk in

Comments (12)
Thursday, October 25, 2007

To my profound disappointment, in the course of reporting on this story, I concluded that the Freemasons do not run the country. They are too amiable and understaffed to handle the power. As much as I'd like to live in a world where the strings were pulled by men in aprons and top hats, I've realized this is not the world we live in.

"If the Freemasons could control the country, we could control ourselves and our lodges a lot better than we [do]. We've got enough problems organizing ourselves," said Simon LaPlace, editor of the publication Connecticut Freemasons.

The state's Freemason population is not composed of high-end businessmen or political leaders. The ones I spoke with were friendly guys who were amused by the Mason's reputation.

"We're mostly working-class folk. It's not an elitist organization anymore. People who are interested in community work who are sort of advocating good works — we're a moral society, that's what we're about," said David Edman, of Friendship No. 33 in Southington.

The Freemasons were established in Connecticut in 1789. There are reportedly between 16,000 and 20,000 current Freemasons in the state — far more than I expected. However, the all-male fraternity has seen a steady decline of members both in the state and nationwide, for over half a century. In America, Masonry's popularity peaked in the '50s.

"There was a bump after World War II," said Edman. "From the '60s on, our average age has been increasing and our membership has been declining in numbers. We're bottoming out."

Starting in the '60s, people under the age of 30 began viewing the Masons as uncool.

"I think people think it's hokey. It's not like moral conduct is something that people consider to be very interesting or exciting," Edman said. "People are very involved with their jobs, and what little time they have left they devote to their families."

 

To garner interest, over 30 of the state's 93 Masonic lodges are opening their doors to the public on Oct. 27. Lodges, and Masonry, are predicated on secret-keeping; lodges have no windows, and the ceremonies held inside them have long been a matter of speculation.

"Freemasonry has a long tradition of being the quiet society. We don't ever recruit, and we have had a steady decline in membership," Edman said. "We decided that it was time to open it up and show the public there aren't that many secrets to our whole society."

The secrets the Masons still have will be closely guarded.

"For many years, masonry has been regarded as secret. And that's created a mystery," LaPlace said. "We have secrets that we vow not to reveal, and if I told you what they were, you'd say 'what's the big deal?'"

Oddly, the Freemasons have benefited from conspiracies in recent years. The Masons groups factored into the popular novel and film The Da Vinci Code, which Edman said, "didn't hurt" membership. While the Catholic society Opus Dei is the villain of the plot, the Knights Templar, and by extension the Masons, are peripheral heroes.

"There is a fairly well-substantiated connection between the Knights Templar and the ancient Freemasons," Edman said. Like the Freemasons, the Knights Templar — who were an order of knights who took monastic-like vows and fought in crusades — play a large role in conspiracy theories. Ultimately they were suppressed by the Church, although the rumors of their secret treasures and continued existence have persisted.

While ancient documents can directly affect Freemasons, the fraternity is also planted in the present, with a surprisingly robust online presence.

"There are probably about 50 Masonic blogs. They're not all active. There are maybe a dozen of us that keep our blogs actively maintained," Freemason Tom Accuosti said. In addition to being the District Grand Lecturer for the Hartford-area district, Accuosti writes the blog The Tao of Masonry.

Accuosti's blog is written in a lighthearted, jokey manner — he calls himself the "Exalted Keeper of the Secrets of Freemasonarianism" and "Crop Circle Planning & Zoning Commissioner." Other Connecticut Mason blogs, including Movable Jewel, written by an officer in Middletown and New Haven Mason Charles Tirrell's Masonic Renaissance, take the order more seriously.

I said it seemed odd that Freemasons, an order noted for its secrecy, would have so many members writing blogs, which are often like online confessionals.

"The whole secretive thing — how do I put this? — we have this reputation for being secretive, but that's really old school," Accuosti said. "When you get right down to it, there's not much to be secretive about."

He added that many members are more conservative and believe the secrets should be kept under wraps. Accuosti noted that the effort to keep secrets can be futile in the information age.

"There are any number of anti-mason Web sites that publish rituals and things. A lot of times they get it wrong," Accuosti said.

 

Now, some Central Connecticut lodges are attracting large numbers of young men. "That's the surprising thing. In Friendship lodge, we had something between 15 and 20 new members," Accuosti said. "Most of them are under 30. In fact, the officers in our lodge are mostly under 30."

Who are these young men joining the Masons?

"It's interesting. A lot of the younger guys who are joining now are gamers. A lot of them are very computer literate, computer savvy guys," Accuosti said. "The same guys who attend [Renaissance] Fairs and take part in live-action role-playing games."

I said, as delicately as possible, that this new generation of Freemasons he described sounded like nerds. Accuosti clarified, they're not just nerds; they're nerds that are suspicious of big government.

"For some reason, there's a geek influence there. I haven't been able to figure that out," Accuosti said. "Politically, a lot of people, whether they're registered with the party or not, tend to be Libertarian."

 

Visit ctfreemasons.net for more information on the Mason's open house.

Send your comments to

editor@hartfordadvocate.com or

abulger@hartfordadvocate.com

 

 

Comments (12)
Post a Comment
Adam - Thank you for a well written and un-hokey article.

There is always some concern that when anyone writes about the Freemasons that we will come off looking old-fashioned, irrelevant, or simply bizarre. Simply put, we are a bunch of guys who - generally - tend to be moral or ethically minded and are interested in introspection and self-improvement.

Part of the history of our secrecy is supposedly because we had to meet on the DL so as not to attract the attention of the Roman Catholic church, who had their own armies and police forces around Europe and disapproved of the "freethinkers" of the Enlightenment.

But part of why we continue to maintain secrecy is because, as with so many teachings that are symbolic and allegorical, it sounds... silly... without any qualifying or contextual background. Imagine watching a pagan or asartu ceremony without having any idea of what the symbols mean or the allegory that's involved; they would seem outre, if not downright bizarre to anyone without at least some background. Our ceremonies are not the same, but the principle applies.

That said, I do take a light-hearted attitude toward Freemasonry because I understand how easy it would be for us to become parodies of ourselves, a la the Simpson's "The Stonecutters" episode.

Introspection and enlightenment are great things, but nobody said that you had to be dour and stern in order to attain them.

Again, thanks for a great article.
Posted by Tom Accuosti on 10.24.07 at 8.44
What I am about to write is in complete truth, and that is why I am withholding my information, being as I am a just and lawfully constituted mason.

Masons do not need to open up their doors and say "come on in" to strangers. There are two reasons why they lack in membership, and one of the reasons could double or triple there membership in a couple short months.

1)Many people, infact MOST people do not know that there are fake lodges in every town in this state. There are members who do not even know they are fake, until they talk to a real member, and are confused. I belong a real lodge, but have bumped into many great men who actually were fake, and didnt know it. These lodges are not rare, and the people are very active within them. I have never visted these lodges, because that would be wrong of me, but before I was fully aware of the person I was talking to being "fake", or in a "fake" lodge, I asked about membership. They said they loved masonry, and make all the meetings, and have new members all the time. Once we talked longer (and I am talking about more than one time in the past month) I realized they were not real. The "real" lodges will not take in these poor, but great men, who were mislead. If they did take in these men, and charter their lodges, masonry would explode in a short months with the biggest growth possibly in state history, and a double or triple attendance in many areas. These mislead people would come if they had the chance. Once they found out the truth some were DEVISTATED.

2)There are not that many great men today in this country. Corruption is everywhere, drugs, etc. There arent that many masons because there are not that many good people.
Posted by withheld on 10.24.07 at 13.32
Wow. This is so wrong that the word "wrong" itself is wrong to cover all the wrongness.

To begin with, in my admittedly few years as a Mason, the only "'fake" Masons that I've run across have tended to be anonymous people who make outlandish claims about Masonry on the internet.

Secondly, if these so-called fake lodges had enough members to double or triple the membership in the "real" lodges, wouldn't that mean that the "fake" lodges have about twice as many members than the "real" ones? That would mean another 30,000 to 45,000 people walking around the state who believe that they are Masons - and yet, never coming into contact with the real ones?

Do those kinds of numbers sound right to you?

Thirdly, about the claim that there are "fake" lodges in every town? Hell, not even every town has a "real" or mainstream lodge, yet they have enough population for fake ones?

Finally, how can you claim on one hand that there are tens of thousands of "great men", and a few sentences later claim that there aren't enough good men?

In the interest of information, allow me to present a few more facts:
There are two "mainstream" branches of Freemasonry in the US: AF&AM and Prince Hall. AF&AM lodges are descendants of the original British lodges of the early 1700s, and all AF&AM lodges can trace their roots back to the United Grand Lodges of England (UGLE). Prince Hall lodges started just before the Revolutionary War, when a group of British soldiers gave a warrant to some black freemen in order to have their own lodge. The Revolution created complications in communication, so it was quite some years before the Prince Hall lodges had a clear charter. By that time, most states had already developed their own Grand Lodges, so the PH lodges remained a separate branch. They were "unrecognized" by the AF&AM Grand Lodges, meaning that the members could not visit each other. Times being what they were, PH lodges tended to have black, and later, Hispanic members. It wasn't until 1989 that the Grand Lodge of Connecticut became the first AF&AM lodge to recognize the PH lodges, soon to be followed by a number of other states. In fact, Friendship Lodge No. 33 was the first AF&AM lodge to arrange a visitation with a PH lodge. This was way before my time. Since then, almost all AF&AM lodges recognize the PH lodges - the exception being in a dozen of the southern states.

The actual statistics are difficult to come by, but membership of AF&AM and PH lodges make up perhaps 85% of the Masons in the US, with the remainder belonging to various small lodges that for one reason or another have splintered off from the mainstream groups. Conn has three or four non-mainstream groups, most of which have lodges located in the cities between New Haven and Stamford. They are not "fake" Masons; however, since they belong to Grand Lodges that can not trace their roots directly to the UGLE, they are not "recognized" and members can not visit each other's lodges. This is not really a big deal, since the few members of unrecognized lodges don't seem to be clamoring to join mainstream lodges. If they were to "demit", or quit the unrecognized lodge, they would certainly be eligible to join PH or AF&AM lodges.

Stories about hordes of men joining unrecognized lodges, only to find out later that they can't visit with the lodge that their grandfather belonged to are legion - and have all of the veracity of the kinds of stories usually told by kids around a campfire. In fact, with the sheer amount of information available in libraries and on the internet, anyone who is unaware of the status of the lodge that they are joining is probably too clueless to be a Mason in the first place. Also, as long as these men are happy in their respective lodges, then what does it matter, anyway? The only time it has any impact is if they happen to be traveling and want to visit a lodge in a different state. Since most of the unrecognized lodges are small and have few members, there is little chance of them finding a compatible lodge elsewhere.

I hope that this helps anyone who might have been interested.

Anyone with questions on this topic or other questions about Freemasonry can write to me at: taccuosti(at)gmail(dot)com, or through my blog at:
http://masonictao.blogspot.com
Posted by Tom Accuosti on 10.24.07 at 17.37
Excellent article! The post about the "fake lodges" is just wierd though. And wrong.

Posted by Aaron on 10.25.07 at 18.59
The article about "fake" lodges is only slightly off. I know many masons who are not recognized. And if they knew they were unrecognized, I am sure a good amount would join to become recognized.

I would like to mention that I cannot disagree with that post, except for the numbers. I know that there are at least 15 "fake" lodges in the state with active members. Not one for every town.

I would also like to add that most of these "fake" lodges have almost all black members. That might be why these white masons do not know about the amount of them, because these people belong to a community that these men are unassociated with.

I believe if "Clandestant" masons were given the chance to become recognized, by possibly joining a lodge that is recognized, numbers will slightly grow.

As a final word, I would like to add that it is alot easier to find a unrecognized mason webpage, then the real ct grand lodge website. If the grand lodge of ct has seen alot of applications through the internet, it could only be a small portion of people who have been seeking masonry through the internet.
Posted by Charlie Sweeney on 10.26.07 at 6.20
Here is a list of SOME masonic "grand lodges" that originated in New York. I have bumped into "fake" masons belonging to a lodge in CT, under juristiction from at least 4 of these over the years. All black men, who have no idea that they are "fake". These are not prince hall. These grand lodges are based in New York, but I am positive there must be at least one "fake" lodge in CT for every grand lodge here.

Enoch Grand Lodge AF&AM (NY)

United Grand Orient (NY)

Universal Grand Orient, Inc. (NY)

King Solomon Grand Lodge AF&AM (NY)

Orient Grand Lodge AF&AM of the State of New York (NY)

St. John's Grand Lodge AF&AM of the World (NY)

Esoteric Grand Lodge of America, Inc. (pending) (NY)

Hiram Grand Lodge AF&AM No. I (Bronx) (NY)

Hiram Grand Lodge AF&AM No. 2 (Manhattan) (NY)

Mecca Grand Lodge AASR (NY)

Unity Grand Lodge AF&AM (NY)

King Cyrus Grand Lodge AF&AM (NY)

Grand Lodge AF&AM of the State of New York (NY)

United Grand Lodge AF&AM Scottish Rite (NY)

St. John's Grand Lodge, Scottish Rite (NY)

Oriental Grand Lodge AF&AM of State of New York (NY)

Alpha Grand Lodge AF&AM (NY)

Most Worshipful Doric Grand Lodge AF&AM, State of New York, Inc. (NY)

Most Worshipful Mystic Tie Grand Lodge (NY)
Posted by Charlie Sweeney on 10.26.07 at 6.29
I diagree with the statement Mr. Accuosti made. "anyone who is unaware of the status of the lodge that they are joining is probably too clueless to be a Mason in the first place." This is just not true, and I know a close mason friend who almost became "clandestant" accidentally, last minute bumping into a "recognized" mason (a few days before his E.A.). 99% of nonmasons do not know any difference between recognized and unrecognized. More men will continue to join "clandestant" lodges if this statement is made to justify the lack of information available to men of "clandestant" lodges, and then not accepting them into "real" lodges.
Posted by Arnold Keifer on 10.26.07 at 11.16
While I may have spoken harshly about someone cluelessly joining an unrecognized lodge, I'm going to make several points about such occurences.

One is that anyone deciding to become a Freemason should probably have some idea of the history and tradition of the fraternity; I have a hard time believing that anyone would join simply as a reason to get out of the house once a week. When petitioning to join a lodge, we caution men against joining out of idle curiousity.If somebody is going to join a lodge without learning anything about what he is joining, or doing a little background research, then I'd call that clueless behavior. When one considers that there is more information about the fraternity available than ever before, there's no excuse for someone to be completely unaware of what he's getting into.

Joining an unrecognized lodge does not make a man a pariah. Any man that joins an unrecognized lodge has the opportunity to demit from that lodge and join a recognized lodge. Yet we rarely see this, certainly not in my district.
And what might induce such a person to join an unrecognized lodge? Quite often men join because they have a general interest in Freemasonry in the first place, and they happen to notice a friend or coworker or colleague with a ring or pin and ask about joining. If the friend belongs to an unrecognized lodge, and if it's an active and pleasant group of guys, well, then maybe it doesn't matter if he joins that lodge. What I'm saying is that if the man who joins this lodge finds it friendly and inviting, and if he enjoys his time there, then he's made a good decision. The real point is not whether the lodge is recognized, it's about whether the individual learns the Masonic lessons of morality and brotherly love.

Finally, I've met - in person and over the internet - men and women from various unrecognized lodges. These brothers (and sisters) have strong ties to their lodges and do not regret their decision to join something out of the mainstream. Calling them "fake" sends a hurtful message to some very nice people; that's why I stick to the term "unrecognized." I have found them all to be just as concerned with morality and self-improvement as anyone from my own lodge. As far as I'm concerned, there's nothing "fake" about that.
Posted by Tom Accuosti on 10.26.07 at 16.39
Isn't it odd , fellows that a discussion about Freemasonry quickly comes to issues of stakeholders amongst Brethren, interesting also that this issue of the Advocate is so divisive as to cause many of the papers to be swiped, at least that's the case in Soutington. Old fashioned politics!.Thank God for the printing press er Internet. I think that Freemasonry, is ancient and still viable when other groups have risen and fallen away, is that in the end its about a universal brotherhood of mankind, and that is a calling which is always anwered, read Kiplings Mother Lodge and you'll know how soem of us think.
Posted by David R Edman on 10.26.07 at 18.48
Bro. Dave, are you sure the papers were swiped? I've looked in every distribution point I could think of, but none of the the gas station or shop owners remember the papers being delivered. Unless you're suggesting that they were taken beforehand?

Heck, that being the case, what makes us think it had anything to do with our article? ;-)

Anyway, I agree that we need to focus on the basic principles of Masonry: brotherly love, relief, truth, charity, morality - no matter where they are practiced.
Posted by Tom Accuosti on 10.27.07 at 4.03
The Open House yesterday was a success in Simsbury, a non event in Southington and we will see from other reports hopefully that the brothers enjoyed putting it on, and that the Grand Lodge COCA effort was sufficient.
Posted by David R Edman on 10.28.07 at 4.28
The humans who built the Pyramids were part of this great order and the people today who are part of it represent the highest attributes of all humanity.
Posted by Perry Peck on 11.14.09 at 20.47
Leave this field empty Name*:

Email*:

URL:

Comment:

All comments must adhere to our Terms & Conditions of Use.

Find it Here:
keyword:
search type:
search in:

« Previous   |   Next »
Print Email RSS feed

The Devil in the Details
Sure, Lieberman pissed off liberals by killing the public option. But there’s more to the story. Here’s the whole truth and what it means for Connecticut.
Immobilized
A pre-schooler in the West Hartford public school system is made to wear a weight vest for being too wiggly
No Sex Offenders
Greenwich ponders restricting where registered sex offenders can go
Nightmare Memory
A witness to Eugenio DeLeon Vega’s slaying says she didn’t say what she said
Cuffed in Pittsburgh
A former Army medic says police stripped him of his insignia and patches during the G-20 summit
Freegan Out
From second-hand clothes to foraging in fields to grabbing dinner out of trash bins, freegans try to take as little as possible from the consumer world
Water World
Will the new expanded bottle deposits mean more money flooding into the state? Critics doubt it.
Crime and Punishment
Round-up of local crimes