News

Coffin Nails Fill State Coffers

Is taxing smokers fair?

Comments (7)
Thursday, August 02, 2007

Hey, smokers! You should inhale a nice, refreshing cigarette while you read this. Maybe two. The exact number doesn't matter; what's important is that you smoke cigarettes purchased instate from a licensed retailer in full compliance with all tax regulations.

Speaking of which, did you notice the price increase that went into effect on July 1? That's because the per-pack state tax went up again. Connecticut now gets two dollars for every pack you buy. That, in turn, explains why you need to keep smoking: according to the Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids, the state expects to collect $400 million from tobacco this year. If every Nutmegger gave up nicotine tomorrow, we'd face a $400 million budgetary shortfall.

Not that anybody in the government's going to come right out and tell you to keep smoking. Nor are they likely to mention that non-smokers cost society far more money than smokers; a non-smoker will (statistically) live up to seven years longer, costing state or federal pension plans another seven years' worth of payment checks. The more people smoke, the richer the government gets.

That leads to a conundrum: Connecticut's one of the wealthiest states in the nation. The majority of smokers are low-income people. Why is a rich state balancing its budget on the backs of the poor?

"Since most people don't smoke, it's not hard to get majority support for an increase in cigarette taxes," said Jacob Sullum, a senior editor for Reason magazine (published by the nonprofit Reason Foundation). "The share of American adults who smoke is down to about 20 percent. As a group, they are less affluent and less politically influential than nonsmokers, and they are widely reviled for their unhealthy, disgusting habit. So when you ask people whether the government should take money from an unpopular minority ... I guess anything less than 80 percent support should be counted as a victory for fairness."

 

With 20 cigarettes in a standard pack, the state gets a dime for every cigarette smoked here. But some smokers, for whatever reason, want to avoid this tax. Doing this is quite simple (though illegal): just buy cigarettes from someplace with a tax rate lower than Connecticut's.

If you have friends in low-tax states, it's easy to have them buy cheap cigarettes and mail them to you. However, not everybody has connections in tobacco country. The most popular means of buying out-of-state smokes is to order them over the Internet, but smokers who avoided taxes this way got an unpleasant surprise last month.

"The Department of Revenue Services will begin sending notices ... to Connecticut residents who owe the state taxes," said a DRS press release. "The initiative is part of an effort by the agency to ensure taxpayer compliance with state cigarette laws."

Those laws, of course, basically boil down to "give the state a dime for every cigarette you smoke." And a federal law called the Jenkins Act makes it very easy for the state to find out who's been keeping that money for themselves.

"The Jenkins Act dates back to the 1940s," said Sarah Kaufman, a spokesman for the DRS. "It requires retailers who sell ? at the time it was mail order ? to individuals out of state" to give the state its customer lists, so revenuers will know where to send the tax bills.

Anyone who bought Internet cigarettes in 2005 or 2006 can expect to receive a DRS back-tax bill, Kaufman said. This is partially to help fill the state's coffers, and partially to make things fair for Connecticut cigarette sellers.

"If people buy over the Internet to avoid the taxes, that's hurting businesses that sell cigarettes here," Kaufman said. So does quitting smoking to avoid the taxes, but that's all right. "Our position is, if people quit, there's no tax. It's just, we are, by the nature of this agency, our mission is to uphold the tax laws of the state of Connecticut."

Not every Internet customer will get a bill for back taxes, though. While most mail-order companies are required by the Jenkins Act to hand their customer lists to the government, one subset of retailers is exempt: Indian tribes who sell tax-free cigarettes are technically sovereign nations where U.S. law doesn't apply.

"We argue that they are bound by the Jenkins Act; they argue they are not," Kaufman said. And so far "they" seem to be winning; Indian reservations have not yet turned their customer records over to the DRS.

Indian tribes in Connecticut make money from their casino monopoly, but one state over, in New York, (untaxed) cigarettes are the primary income source.

Allofourbutts.com is just one of many New York-based Indian cigarette sellers, this one run by the Seneca Indian Nation. The Advocate called to ask if the tribe turned its customer records over to state revenue departments. "We're exempt from that right now," said the woman who answered the phone (and preferred not to be named). "They're trying to get our information, but so far they haven't."

The key words here are "so far." Given America's shaky record of upholding treaty obligations with Indian tribes, it probably wouldn't be wise to put your faith in such treaties now. (Assuming you wanted to buy tax-free cigarettes in the first place, but you really shouldn't do that.)

Hypothetically, suppose you bought such cigarettes in person and paid with cash? There would be no record to trace. Such Indian tribes in New York aren't as common as those who make mail-order sales, but they do exist.

The nearest one seems to be the tribe running the Poospatuck Smoke Shop on Long Island (a 190-mile round trip from downtown Hartford, according to Google maps). Poospatuck "hasn't done mail-order [cigarette sales] for two years," said the woman who answered their toll-free number. So how do they sell cigarettes?

"It's like a store. You come in, you make your purchase and you leave. There's no [customer] records kept."

Sarah Kaufman of the DRS said that you can only bring one carton of out-of-state cigarettes home with you; any more than that and you're expected to pay the full $20 per carton tax. Considering gas prices these days, it's not worth $20 to drive all the way to Long Island and back just for a single carton of cigarettes. You'd need to buy at least four or five, which would be illegal.

Of course, the chance of getting caught is very low, unless the state decided to have drunk-driving-style checkpoints looking for untaxed Indian cigarettes.

"We're not going to have checkpoints," Kaufman said when asked about the possibility. "We're not the Gestapo."

 

Send comments to
jabel@hartfordadvocate.com

Comments (7)
Post a Comment
Enough of the taxing of smokers. I don't even smoke and i feel sorry for smokers. Many rational people have already noted that a tax on cig's is a regressive tax. Now congress wants to fund universal child health care w/ an increase in the federal cigarette tax, all the while nanny government, wants to regulate cigarettes, and gradually reduce the amount of nicotte in smokes so people do not become addicted. If no one is addict, how will the precious universal child healthcare be funded. Great idea congress. don't blame me, I didnt vote for any of those glorified tax collectors we call senators and representitives. This is just my 0.02
Posted by Travis on 8.2.07 at 11.59
Great article Jennifer,

I just gave up smoking a couple of days ago. Now I feel like starting again just so I can avoid the tax that I would have paid had I continued.
Posted by imk on 8.2.07 at 13.13
Good article. I was not aware of the Jenkins Act. What other regulatory horrors are there of a similar nature out there?

By the way, your comments section seems cut from the same cloth, where I must read the T&C. What's up with that, is that so my IP Address might be recorded to pursue tax liability?
Posted by AckMed on 8.3.07 at 4.04
Hey, I'm not a smoker so I hadn't thought of this, but couldn't one just have their shipment sent to a place a couple doors down, paid with a money order or some other anon type funds, so it's address to "IB Abel, c/o Shipit Tueme"? Then the tax dude comes, tries to give a bill to IB Abel, who doesn't exist as it's a psudonym, and Shipit wasn't the addressee, and there's no money trail, so who actually bought the cigs? I would think this would create some kind of protection, might be interesting to ask a tax lawyer how many layers of confusion had to be introduced to provide protection.
Posted by AckMed on 8.3.07 at 4.11
It's the height of phoniness for CT lawmakers to tax cigs every chance they get. They have a goal of driving down the number of smokers, but they depend on them for money; they get tobacco settlement money in and don't spend it to drive down tobacco users either. It's a crying shame. If these rat bastards ever quit spending every dime they get, they wouldn't need to tax the poor smokers. They do the same with gas taxes too...we pay the highest gas tax in the country, but Connecticut braintrusts spend less than half of what is collected on our roads and public transporation.
Posted by Disgusted Taxpayer on 8.3.07 at 7.39
Alaska also jacked its tobacco taxes up by 20 cents on July 1st. The price of a pack of Marlboro Menthols ranges from $6.28 at Walmart to as much as $6.75 in other locations.

If we were actually getting something valuable to the greater society in return, it might be worth it. But the money frequently will be diverted into these endless anti-smoking propaganda campaigns. I would bet the money we spend on government propaganda campaigns each year could rebuild a certain bridge in Minnesota.

It is not government's responsilbility to monitor my health.
Posted by Anchorage Activist on 8.6.07 at 14.30
What is the difference in buying cigarettes online and not paying tax and buying a Wii, or clothes, or whatever online and not paying for tax? This I do not understand.
Posted by CJ on 10.20.08 at 10.42
Leave this field empty Name*:

Email*:

URL:

Comment:

All comments must adhere to our Terms & Conditions of Use.

Find it Here:
keyword:
search type:
search in:

« Previous   |   Next »
Print Email RSS feed

The Devil in the Details
Sure, Lieberman pissed off liberals by killing the public option. But there’s more to the story. Here’s the whole truth and what it means for Connecticut.
Immobilized
A pre-schooler in the West Hartford public school system is made to wear a weight vest for being too wiggly
No Sex Offenders
Greenwich ponders restricting where registered sex offenders can go
Nightmare Memory
A witness to Eugenio DeLeon Vega’s slaying says she didn’t say what she said
Cuffed in Pittsburgh
A former Army medic says police stripped him of his insignia and patches during the G-20 summit
Freegan Out
From second-hand clothes to foraging in fields to grabbing dinner out of trash bins, freegans try to take as little as possible from the consumer world
Water World
Will the new expanded bottle deposits mean more money flooding into the state? Critics doubt it.
Crime and Punishment
Round-up of local crimes